Aspose::Cells::Row::GetEnumerator method
Contents
[
Hide
]Row::GetEnumerator() method
Gets the cells enumerator.
Enumerator<Cell> Aspose::Cells::Row::GetEnumerator()
ReturnValue
The cells enumerator
Examples
Aspose::Cells::Startup();
Workbook workbook(u"template.xlsx");
Cells cells = workbook.GetWorksheets().Get(0).GetCells();
Enumerator<Cell> en = cells.GetRows().Get(1).GetEnumerator();
while (en.MoveNext())
{
Cell cell = (Cell)en.GetCurrent();
std::cout << cell.GetName().ToUtf8() << std::endl;
}
Aspose::Cells::Cleanup();
See Also
- Class Enumerator
- Class Cell
- Class Row
- Namespace Aspose::Cells
- Library Aspose.Cells for C++
Row::GetEnumerator(bool, bool) method
Gets an enumerator that iterates cells through this row.
Enumerator<Cell> Aspose::Cells::Row::GetEnumerator(bool reversed, bool sync)
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| reversed | bool | whether enumerate cells in reversed order |
| sync | bool | whether the returned enumerator should check the modification of cells in this row and keep synchronized with it. |
ReturnValue
The cell enumerator
Remarks
If the row will be modified(by operations that may cause new Cell be instantiated or existing Cell be removed) during the traversal with the enumerator, synchronized enumerator should be used instead of normal enumerator so that the traversal can continue from the position just after the one has been traversed by the last MoveNext(). However, together with the advantage that no element be skipped or traversed repeatedly, the disadvantage for synchronized enumerator is that the performance will be degraded a bit when comparing with normal enumerator.
See Also
- Class Enumerator
- Class Cell
- Class Vector
- Class Row
- Namespace Aspose::Cells
- Library Aspose.Cells for C++